|
|
| Author |
Message |
new_pipar
User
Joined: 12 Oct 2009
My Posts
Location: Arlington, TX
|
 Posted: Thu Mar 04, 2010 6:32 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
| Sabotage wrote: | It's not an amazon. They already said the Barbarian would be the only class they were bringing in from D2 at this time (meaning, before expansions.)
Could definitely be something similar, but I hope they'll be just as unique as with Monk and Wizard. |
all they did was change the names really
wizard is a sorc, witch-doctor is a necro, and idk bout monk tho lol seems dumb if you ask me
but definatly the first character anyone will make in d3 will be a Wizard for the Tele... i know i will  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sabotage
Moderator
Joined: 15 May 2004
My Posts
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 04, 2010 8:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| No. Only one skill tree on the wizard is the same as sorc. And the witch doctor is so much of an upgraded version of necro as to not be the same at all. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
lord2800
Section Leader
Joined: 05 Jul 2002
My Posts
Location: /sbin/
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 05, 2010 4:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
| DC.GeNeSiS wrote: | You mean to tell me that the Wizard bears no similarities to the Sorceress from Diablo 2?  |
Had you bothered to do any of the background reading, you'd realize that the two are as fundamentally different as the warrior from Diablo I and the paladin from Diablo II are. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
bells
User
Joined: 24 Jun 2008
My Posts
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 06, 2010 5:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| lord2800 wrote: | | DC.GeNeSiS wrote: | | You mean to tell me that the Wizard bears no similarities to the Sorceress from Diablo 2? |
Had you bothered to do any of the background reading, you'd realize that the two are as fundamentally different as the warrior from Diablo I and the paladin from Diablo II are. |
It fills the same roll as sorcerer and sorceress did, teleporting magic spammer. The only roll that hasn't been filled yet is the physical ranged attacker(rogue, zon). |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Staks
Retired Mod
Joined: 20 Mar 2004
My Posts
Location: ̡͌l̡*̡̡ ̴̡ı̴̴̡ ̡̡͡|̲̲̲͡͡͡ ̲▫̲͡ ̲̲̲͡͡π̲̲͡͡ ̲̲͡▫̲̲͡͡ ̲|̡
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 06, 2010 5:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| move on |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DC.GeNeSiS
Nearly Banned
Joined: 19 Aug 2004
My Posts
Location: Columbus, Ohio
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 19, 2010 10:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
| lord2800 wrote: | | DC.GeNeSiS wrote: | | You mean to tell me that the Wizard bears no similarities to the Sorceress from Diablo 2? |
Had you bothered to do any of the background reading, you'd realize that the two are as fundamentally different as the warrior from Diablo I and the paladin from Diablo II are. |
Who gives a shit about background story? I'm talking about how the characters themselves will PLAY. As in, you know, this IS a game afterall. I could give a fuck less about the (please note: FICTIONAL) backgrounds of the characters themselves.. The way they will play, is IDENTICAL. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Kopasetic99
User
Joined: 30 Jul 2010
My Posts
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 30, 2010 9:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'm 99.99% sure it will be a ranger class of some sort. I'm more than positive they know there are only 2 ranged classes currently, both of which use magical attacks (Witch Doctor / Sorceress) and two melee classes that are physical (obv) (Barbarian/Monk) - the only other logical class for a 5th class release would be a ranged physical. I.E. Ranger and/or Amazon.
I honestly don't think Paladin's will be making an appearance anytime soon, which is just fine with me because Paladins, while fun, are ridiculously overplayed. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
crackalacka
User
Joined: 10 Jan 2004
My Posts
Location: st louis, MO
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 30, 2010 12:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| DC.GeNeSiS wrote: | | lord2800 wrote: | | DC.GeNeSiS wrote: | | You mean to tell me that the Wizard bears no similarities to the Sorceress from Diablo 2? |
Had you bothered to do any of the background reading, you'd realize that the two are as fundamentally different as the warrior from Diablo I and the paladin from Diablo II are. |
Who gives a shit about background story? I'm talking about how the characters themselves will PLAY. As in, you know, this IS a game afterall. I could give a fuck less about the (please note: FICTIONAL) backgrounds of the characters themselves.. The way they will play, is IDENTICAL. |
lol he didnt say backstory. he said background reading, as in, actually learning about the character before you talk about it. lol |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Soulzek
User Gold
Joined: 02 Dec 2002
My Posts
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 30, 2010 12:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| DC.GeNeSiS wrote: | | I could'NT give a fuck less about the (please note: FICTIONAL) backgrounds of the characters themselves.. |
Learn what a sentence means FFS. If I could find the topic(s) about these fucking annoying sayings I would direct you to them.
| Code: |
if (care > 0) printf("I could care less.");
else if (care == 0) printf("I couldn't care less.");
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Dr.Duck
User Gold
Joined: 06 Jun 2006
My Posts
Location: ~/dev
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 30, 2010 2:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Soulzek wrote: | | DC.GeNeSiS wrote: | | I could'NT give a fuck less about the (please note: FICTIONAL) backgrounds of the characters themselves.. |
Learn what a sentence means FFS. If I could find the topic(s) about these fucking annoying sayings I would direct you to them.
| Code: |
if (care > 0) printf("I could care less.");
else if (care == 0) printf("I couldn't care less.");
|
|
Well put, sir. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
